All CutsDHSFEMA Grants
EliminatedCritical Impact Budget PDF p. 32

FEMA Non-Disaster Grant Programs

(FEMA Grants)

Department of Homeland Security
Proposed Cut
$1.3B
% Reduction
80%
Action Type
elimination
Who Is Served

State/local emergency management; firefighters (SAFER/AFG); Urban Areas Security Initiative cities; port security

What This Program Does

FEMA Non-Disaster Grant Programs provide federal funding to help state and local governments prepare for emergencies, including terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and other crises. Key programs include the Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG), Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER), the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI), and port security grants. These programs have existed in various forms since the early 2000s, primarily following the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Who Would Be Affected

The proposed cut of approximately $1.3 billion — roughly 80% of current funding — would affect state and local emergency management agencies, fire departments across the country, major metropolitan areas that receive urban security funding, and port authorities. SAFER and AFG grants alone support thousands of fire departments nationwide with staffing and equipment. UASI funds flow to the cities considered most at risk for terrorist attacks, helping them maintain specialized response capabilities.

What This Cut Would Mean

If enacted, many state and local governments would need to either fund emergency preparedness programs themselves or scale them back significantly. Fire departments that rely on federal grants for hiring and equipment could face staffing shortages or station closures, particularly in smaller and rural communities with limited tax bases. The administration argues that emergency preparedness is primarily a state and local responsibility and that remaining federal funds should be redirected to border security priorities. Independent analysts and emergency management professionals have warned that reduced preparedness funding could leave communities more vulnerable to both natural disasters and security threats, with costs potentially shifting to disaster response after events occur rather than prevention beforehand.

Administration's Stated Rationale

“State/local emergency preparedness is a state responsibility; federal grants reduced to border security priorities.”

More from DHS